Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
看三分钟解说都嫌长，这种一句话剧情没必故弄玄虚拍出来。
基本是荒野求生的独角戏。
除了派没什么能看的……剧情稀碎，我是谁赢了好几百楼，我是谁甚至还有失忆梗，飞车特技和漂亮小姐姐！！！
自己不觉得自己离谱吗？是应景了，可战场下来的在那大大咧咧看伤口？战术动作全忘了？喝个啤酒看个乐呵吧
30.野心的编剧写出啰嗦繁琐的不合格剧本。
啊怎么瓣评分及格都没有？6.5应该有的吧。低配版碟影重重的感觉。男主whump 场景蛮诱人的（。虽然男主队长角色像个大傻子，退役军人被蒙骗被用完即弃的表达也挺老套，但总体上这种冷峻氛围打造得还是不错的。
5.0 质感独特的文艺小片，可能需要强大的表演才能撑得起如此复杂的内心戏。
天哪，前面铺垫那么久是为了啥？太多余了，完全可以在战斗中穿插起前面想要铺垫的剧情，从进入柏林后，后面的节奏马上起来了，打斗没有过于超人化，还是不错。建议大家看个开头10分钟后，拖到后面从柏林行动开始。
寓言故事，不过和科恩兄弟拍的那些差了十万八千里，剧本里面没有故事和戏剧
淘金版《荒野求生》，巨大利益面前的搏命挣扎……虽然猜不到结局，但还是感觉知道结果……
其实立意不错，就是感觉回家的路也过于轻松了吧
克里斯大大的颜值真的能打*･゜ﾟ･*:.｡..｡.:*･'(*ﾟ▽ﾟ*)'･*:.｡. .｡.:*･゜ﾟ･* 本作相比隔壁宝刀未老明显预算不足、故事套路、服道化以及动作设计只有普通美剧水平╮(￣▽￣"")╭ 但是可是然鹅。。。。。克里斯粉丝还是可以拿来打卡哒*･゜ﾟ･*:.｡..｡.:*･'(*ﾟ▽ﾟ*)'･*:.｡. .｡.:*･゜ﾟ･*
后半段夹带着阴谋论，动机和剧情还不错，只可惜最终没有很好地结局，并没有深挖，只是流于表面的解决问题，而前期做的铺垫关于疫苗、关于幕后黑手都没有涉及，不得不说是一个遗憾。
whaaaaat看完才发现居然是扎克埃夫隆
灰灰色畫面⋯很棒👍
化妆很牛啊！看完之后就会一直想起“一个半朋友”的故事。
男主最终被见死不救的同伴耗死，同伴也没有好下场，被女人的姐姐射穿心脏，拿不到黄金
实际5分，不能再多了。中间剧情还有个重要的bug，把两个受伤的人互换了。整体没啥条理。
影片一半，就猜到同伴不会回来。男主的贪心，错过了几次求生的机会。
13看到一半就知道结局，贪者贫也，这世界道德正确不一定成功，并且还犯大错
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
