A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
打着赘婿的牌面，炒冷饭又是把现代元素乱加入，败家子一下成主角变化的有点乱套和不习惯！我就想搞清楚一点：女主角也是穿越过去的吗？
唯一可取的是还能原班人马演绎新故事，至于其它，还是那个配方、那个味道！
把它当喜剧去看，轻松快乐，后面的反转挺有趣
相比于第一季更加喜欢这个第1.5季，小汤圆这个女性角色的设置与苏檀儿只能给宁毅打辅助的设置相比更加好看
轻松搞笑，完成度可以的，而且怎么感觉这一部反而更契合赘婿的主题呢。
二房父子俩太好笑了……还cos朱自清的《背影》……结果拿出一串香蕉……哈哈哈哈哈，真的好笑
挺好的一个网剧番外的模式，做到了完整保留了正剧故事背景及调性，番外主角的人设也和正剧高度一致，并且很好地延展了人物的另外一面的故事，有人物弧光更加丰满。笑点和节奏都掌握的很好，演技也不尬，给同类网剧的番外创作树立了很好的标杆。故事很简单，还是在古代开金手指的无厘头搞笑，不仅做了正剧的补充，还很好地完善了一些正剧中的细节，并且完成了给第二季做铺垫埋伏笔的任务。单看也是个轻松向的网大，中规中矩。
四星~ 下饭下饭~
这个吉吉国王我早在大秦赋里面就觉得他的郭开很出彩，应该去演喜剧。果然就看到赘婿电视剧了。没想到现在又专门为他打造一部他主演的同名电影，看来也有人看到了他身上的吉吉气质！希望看到他更好的角色电影！！！未来可期！
熟肉https://rz26883330.m.icoc.ws/
好创意，0惊吓，背十字架的耶稣，正邪互驱，活过来的修女神像。
作为苏文兴的支线故事，这部电影剧情逻辑都挺流畅的，感觉没有特别大的漏洞，给个四星，鼓励一下。
看了这么多部驱魔片，发现牧师驱魔能力都挺弱。信仰力不够强大专注，念力不够大吧。最后魔鬼披上人的外衣进行布道，就跟佛陀讲末法时期魔子魔孙在人间作乱一样。好想看佛教、道教驱魔片。
[2021.08.30] 吉吉国王远走他乡找到了个外挂 还挺漂亮 顺便成就一番事业。照搬正传的一些梗和互联网概念略微牵强 整体还是比预想的好一些 香蕉和画猴挺逗的 官方吐槽最为致命
作为番外篇，原班人马好评，拍的很欢乐，看的很轻松，希望剧版第二部快点开播吧
结尾拍出了在末法时代里，魔鬼会披上宗教的名义控制人类，称之为敌基督。魔鬼占领权力机构，上帝选择拯救平凡人也很符合圣经中心思想。
赶鬼与赶主同步进行倒是很新颖，影片暗讽末世的教会现状也的确是很贴切了。但在基督徒的角度，Father Peter终究还是软弱了，靠与恶魔Balban的交易，结果必定不是喜乐，无花果树能生橄榄吗？葡萄树能结无花果吗？咸水里也不能发出甜水来，得胜只能靠主。
还可以，还是喜剧风格好看，比《赘婿》电视剧后半段有趣多了。
还不错，标准的商业片格式，演技都过关，看着还是很欢乐的
在一众垃圾小成本网作剧里 这部算是很好的了 虽然作为番外不可避免的承袭了赘婿的热度梗和剧情 但本来这就是番外 很正常
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
