Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
约会APP广告吧，过于狗血，不过也许小镇上的人际关系就是这么错综复杂吧
符合我个人的口味，豆瓣评分虚低。奇形怪状的大怪兽战斗加励志的欢乐正能量。搞笑与温情并行。俗套也是可以容忍的。大怪兽的细节出色皮肤肌理有质感。最后那个折椅真的高光幽默。时常控制的也很好不会过于冗长无聊。小女孩的热情勇敢、自我怀疑、沮丧消沉、和最后的奋进都很真实。4星必须的。
整体还是不错的，是一个寻找自我的故事，虽然套路比较老了，而且最后主角们还是都成了另一个父辈，不过中心思想还是好的
除了希望能赶紧看到触手和老雷本的涩图，没有什么想说的，就很普通的剧情
我们看过很多版本的人类训练机甲、机器人搏斗的电影，这个是“舞林争霸”版！
剧情老套，这个女孩的性格我很讨厌~( ´•︵•` )~！！！
Hmmm，音乐不错，其他很一般，打发时间看。
很正的体育文化，同时告诉我们，体育俱乐部的社区建设，不能压住在明星球员上。
“chicken”和胸肌舞也太好笑了【可以理解为神烦警探和发展受阻的彩蛋】。半成品电影只能靠挪用卡司出演的剧集笑点来制造彩蛋，这不就是我的人生吗。
其实还挺好看的 就是篇幅太短了感觉比较赶 很多事交待的不是特别清楚
怎么说呢，
这个时代就是写不出冲突了是吗 没有二元对立的时代 就没有伟大的冲突了吗
似在过去和现在的夹缝中生存的人，注定在未来受苦
老套的剧情 从最开始基本就能猜到后面的剧情
You must either conquer and rule or serve and lose.
片名翻译的多少有点问题，我觉得叫怪兽摔跤手更合适一点。故事本身是一个温馨简单的成长类，结构完整，笑点也够。缺点是，角色的动机都挺奇特的，而且“父辈的阴影”这个有点怪。开场的怪物剪影很不错。但是龙头怪设计的太差了，很烦。略平庸。
五六分吧，剧情比较老套，看完整集我有点好奇父辈都去哪里了？ 不过怪兽跳舞还挺有趣的。
一星給terry，一星給NBA的老梗。boring(=_=)
约会APP广告吧，过于狗血，不过也许小镇上的人际关系就是这么错综复杂吧
就过于无聊，大概正儿八经的真人电影也很少用这类故事写剧本了，而且不仅怪兽形象不算讨喜之外，其他人都像去模拟人生直接扣出来的，直白点可能就是难看吧。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
