剧情介绍

  喜剧,讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人,周旋于女友和未来岳父之间,因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人,认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
  Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
  Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
  The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
  Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
  Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
  Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
  In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
  On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

评论:

  • 暄枫 5小时前 :

    生若蜉蝣,行如流水

  • 臧康健 7小时前 :

    There's no final goodbye

  • 梦初 1小时前 :

    【2021年CHI选五星1/50】我在这里感受到了生与死的共鸣,生,是件愉悦且归属的开始,死,是不必悲伤但定会永恒的再始。我们出生的那一天,脱离母胎其实就是无依可归,我们的灵魂自由而美丽,去变幻出许多种可能,这种可能是就像现在看到这部作品,看到有艺术家能拍摄到自然的美景加以情境和电影叙事呈现到观众,也有可能是女主费恩的主流群体之外的游牧生活,更有可能是导演赵婷本人,再有可能是有幸爱电影的我们能看到成千上万的艺术电影。观看中被自然宇宙中的辽阔无垠和人间之情两者间巧妙的心灵连接打动潸然泪下,人物完美的纪实化、诗意揉化纪实中的苦、对被逐渐消失的小镇的边缘人群演绎一段“流浪者的浪漫”故事。

  • 狂景明 9小时前 :

    「當你在穿山越嶺的另一邊 我在孤獨的路上沒有盡頭」

  • 玥明 1小时前 :

    挺有圣丹斯气质的电影 非常贴合川普、次贷危机、被抛弃的边缘白人等等时代热门议题 还挺theAtlantic 影像语言我倒是挺喜欢的 诗化的neo-nomand 从更authentic、贴近其本意的视角去呈现 游牧民族本身有重自由、轻物质的特点 本片的方法让人感觉这也是一种可以接受的生活

  • 鸿钊 2小时前 :

    非常终极小清新又带点鸡汤的视角,弗兰西斯和赵婷都挺稳的,各自将自己的气质和节奏融合在了这个她人的故事里。里面细节的呼应,节奏的控制,人物关系的发展转变,还是可以看出导演控制的能力。只是配乐听起来有点廉价,素材音乐的感觉,不知是出于什么考虑。但说实话,这片挺浅的,就像赵看起来也是个追求简单的人,想摆脱所有社会政治标签,纯粹探讨人存在的简单状态。但从这片这两天的遭遇来看,这种探讨也是有些鸵鸟性质的。看完挺舒服,但没什么触动,可能没有可比性,如果同类主题,我会更爱《蜂蜜之地》这样的片子。

  • 韵柔 4小时前 :

    20210428 1735 Palace ifc

  • 韦鹤梦 9小时前 :

    在来西班牙的飞机上看的电影,对美国底层的刻画非常忠实。但看得出赵婷心里是有光的,她并未仅仅以悲惨吸引眼球,她刻画的是一个物质匮乏,但人心却纯洁而亲密的“底层美国”。

  • 霍念梦 3小时前 :

    倔强与孤独,逃离人生的无意义,让自己始终保持游荡/遇见/寻找/放纵,沉浸在自然与无为中,大概就是最自由的样子。

  • 羊舌惜寒 9小时前 :

    上路起初是被动的选择,但慢慢地,她离不开这样的生活了。篝火旁,人们诉说自己的故事,天亮后,就此别过。我们生来就是孤独。

  • 第昊英 8小时前 :

    二刷之后,还是一样,后半段没办法看完,8倍速结束了。让人犯困的旅程,现在是真的,平铺直叙的流水账可以叫隐忍克制的处理,配上钢琴和各种孤独的背影,深邃的眼神,好文艺好高级,不拿奖岂不是显得评委没水平?皇帝的新衣就这样来的。穿着新衣,我们路上见。🙄

  • 运绿蕊 8小时前 :

    这是一部表现追求独立人格的电影,哀而不伤。

  • 美雅 3小时前 :

    8.0

  • 项筠竹 8小时前 :

    影像技术非常好,但是对故事重心走向感到失望,我不能满意呈现出超大型资本世界下零工生活、和被宛如火山灰覆盖的废旧工厂同时,出于对个人悲辛叙事的着迷,把原子化的老年困境拍成带上一层田园牧歌滤镜的选择。不过看到科恩嫂在清泉中裸体平躺独对天地,看到与性无关的衰老女性身体,清洁,一无所有,对那种孤独有所触动,在那一幕流下眼泪。

  • 雀君之 0小时前 :

    去看看美好的东西吧,去世界尽头,去看雁群,去看孤独,人类可以选择孤独,有些力量比逃避孤独的愿望更加强烈。被荒芜笼罩、无枝可依,但是还是走吧,走吧,往前走吧。“这些孤独最终会与你们产生联结”

  • 鲜于建德 9小时前 :

    生命是趟没有终点的旅程,不论我们选择走哪条路都没有对错之分,而生命的终极意义是摆脱无明找到真我。

  • 星延 4小时前 :

    这部电影跨越了事实与虚构的界限 赵婷参与了真实人物的真实经历 并且没有把 linda may、swankie、bob wells 这些人客体化 而是透过镜头观察他们 让社会评论通过这些人流露出来 赵没有表达任何政治声明 只是把镜头对准他们作为自己的表态 这对于充满了主观性的电影创作来说真的非常特别 更何况主题本身——探讨「家」这个流动的概念——我就很喜欢 我还喜欢赵婷为配乐挑选的《seven days walking》把作曲家在阿尔卑斯山的徒步旅行与虚构人物 fern 不断变化的内心拼接在了一起 共性是「同受大自然启发」还喜欢这部电影用将石头投入篝火中纪念的方式回应了 2020 年的动荡和焦虑 为从主流社会退出开辟自己的道路带来一种可能 什么是 homeless?什么是 houseless?

  • 牢夏柳 5小时前 :

    6/4/2021 @ Palace IFC。 孤身走我路 是痛苦卻也自豪

  • 红冰海 4小时前 :

    有选择而浪漫才是真浪漫。

  • 海鑫 0小时前 :

    这是中产阶级镜头视角下的无依之地,有荒原大漠,有沧海星河,还有浪漫和诗意,更有连绵不断的忧伤和孤独。导演简略了路上的艰辛和龌龊,但她仍旧用那些美景、相逢的旅人,以及人间的善意来证明:人生任何阶段都可以拥有一颗拥抱自由的心!这部作品表现出的冷静与温柔,我很喜欢,虽然我亲眼所见美国更真实的老无所依和流离失所,基本和这电影表现的完全不同

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved