A sharp, witty, mind-expanding and exuberant foray into the world of logic with computer scientist Professor Dave Cliff. Following in the footsteps of the award-winning 'The Joy of Stats' and its sequel, 'Tails You Win - The Science of Chance', this film takes viewers on a new rollercoaster ride through philosophy, maths, science and technology- all of which, under the bonnet, run on logic.
Wielding the same wit and wisdom, animation and gleeful nerdery as its predecessors, this film journeys from Aristotle to Alice in Wonderland, sci-fi to supercomputers to tell the fascinating story of the quest for certainty and the fundamentals of sound reasoning itself.
Dave Cliff, professor of computer science and engineering at Bristol University, is no abstract theoretician. 15 years ago he combined logic and a bit of maths to write one of the first computer programs to outperform humans at trading stocks and shares. Giving away the software for free, he says, was not his most logical move...
With the help of 25 seven-year-olds, Professor Cliff creates, for the first time ever, a computer made entirely of children, running on nothing but logic. We also meet the world's brainiest whizz-kids, competing at the International Olympiad of Informatics in Brisbane, Australia.
'The Joy of Logic' also hails logic's all-time heroes: George Boole who moved logic beyond philosophy to mathematics; Bertrand Russell, who took 360+ pages but heroically proved that 1 + 1 = 2; Kurt Godel, who brought logic to its knees by demonstrating that some truths are unprovable; and Alan Turing, who, with what Cliff calls an 'almost exquisite paradox', was inspired by this huge setback to logic to conceive the computer.
Ultimately, the film asks, can humans really stay ahead? Could today's generation of logical computing machines be smarter than us? What does that tell us about our own brains, and just how 'logical' we really are...?
虽然有着差不多的结构和叙事
内容大于电影。在宣传上，印度电影逐渐有韩国电影那味儿了，敢于“自黑”。
“一位女性以近似恐怖袭击的方式，完成了一次直达天庭的上访。”
印度反思起来有时候比韩国都厉害，但就是改不了。
看了剪辑，这个电影很感拍。只是在zg没有这种题材，但是即便如此，那些人依旧对女性的困境不闻不问。做法有些偏激，但不极端又如何被看到呢？里面的路人也一样冷漠无情，为了娱乐流量，整个世界都如此没有人情味…
和前作一样，抛出一道无解题，然后对同一个情绪点进行集中猛攻，这种方法确实是适合颁奖季的。然而芬沙伊德是个执行力过强的导演，滥用对比，每场戏的目的都过于明显，人物状态生硬得不像话。当然这也和原本迷你剧体量的剧本有关，等到电影后半段，情节突然增速，一堆没头没脑的单薄角色接不住情绪戏，故事就彻底陷入胡言乱语了。
我立意很高，观众的欣赏能力也就这样，所以剧本什么的就随便弄一下就行了吧，前半段把观众的当傻子按在地上摩擦的剧情是真的让人有点生理不适感。但不得不提的是最后的落点立住了，典型的情绪流电影吧
最后法律逻辑上，美国是无罪推定的疑罪从无。并且就算确定了5岁妹妹开枪也大概率就是几年监外执行。
片尾的数据令人心惊，却又在意料之中，这就是女性生存的世界，这就是男权社会。
里外都是监狱，没什么差别。部分情节商业味明显，搅乱整体调性，间接削弱了布洛克的精彩表演，受害者兄弟逻辑捉急，结尾交叉蒙太奇莫名其妙，如此若干问题持续摧毁观感，让本片最终十分平庸。
比起弱点，桑爪更应该借这个片拿奥斯卡。估计是公司没好好操作。
Till it happens to you you won't know
多让人肃然起敬！
死刑就能遏制强奸吗？从法律的角度讲，未必，但是强奸这事必须得到重视，女性的地位和权益需要提升和保护，虚构的故事，直戳残酷的现实！
这是世界，人与人之间，真的很难做到感同身受。我们能做的，就是尽量做好自己，以身作则。
一个伟大的故事，女主这样的英雄只存在于电影里，现实里不会有这样的机会，这才是更无奈的地方。配乐太烂了，从头到尾都是重复的一小段。
【7.2/10】能猜到背后有隐情，老师不会真的伤害孩子，前面悬念即便做再好也不会很惊悚。印度女性生活在水深火热之中，所以从真相上来说并不新鲜，但在其环境下社会意义还是很大。本片制作应该挺大，搞得印度人好像都是在都市，人们生活得都挺光鲜，警察好像也挺高端，国家挺文明还有个厉害的女总理。电影最大的bug在一切都太理想化了，事情几乎都按着她一个菜鸟罪犯的掌控在发展，要么运气不错没出太大纰漏，男女两人反抗都被女主一人干倒了，男警官知道女主动机后，立马真心忏悔自我检讨，我们太想出名了忽略了伤害，总理也很圣人不顾危险同意来现场和罪犯面谈。最后反转我倒是没想到，但是不是也有点硬呢，那么一个坏人，从开始就表现得就是一个怂男人。
电影都只是美好结局
印度电影里较为常见的题材，以暴制暴的核心！
拍的不好，故事显得狗血了，要不能和曼切斯特差不多吧？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
