Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
公爵色诱德艺双馨芭蕾舞妖僧拉斯普京……
谁想看这个起源故事？我们都想看后续和精彩的打斗枪战，电影在大部分无聊对白中度过
wtf…………………………………好诡异 伏地魔大人演些啥……
这年月的电影是不是真的除了服化道之外一无是处……
动作戏不错，斗杀拉斯普丁段落是最大亮点。对这种历史大格局下的恶趣味我还蛮喜欢的。原来不能引进是因为列宁，最后希特勒出场让我对下一部充满期待。
最出彩的是瑞斯 伊凡斯的表演了，男主儿子的死亡出乎我意料，不过真实地反映出战争的残酷，不听父母话的儿子得到血的教训，可惜没有回头路，交代了王牌特工的起源。
大制作的B级片。从拉斯普京到儿子得勋章是全局最佳，拉斯普京段落充斥着性暗示让人笑翻。全局最搞笑台词当属伏地魔深情的说：“每当我杀一个人，我的灵魂就少了一片”。导演估计是罗琳资深粉
动用了很多伎俩想要标新立异，或者吸引观众，包括对政治历史的演绎，还是把以战争为背景的大格局，做成了一个叛逆期儿子对抗更年期老爹的家庭剧，然后儿子把自己玩死，老爹奋起报仇。
这个英国导演确实是“人才”，颠倒历史，胡编乱造。英国本是世界近代历史的“搅屎棍子”，大英帝国的崩塌把世界各地弄的烽烟四起。导演却胡编乱造，在电影把“英国贵族”描述成拯救世界的英雄。纯属自我意淫。
苏格兰与英格兰矛盾乃是世界终极矛盾。
把仪式感拍的这么糟糕，帅哥也难看起来，这个起源没有必要；
我至今仍然忘不了《王牌特工：特工學院》當時帶給我的興奮感，幾段精彩的動作戲依然能清晰記得，然後，續集是令人失望的，唯一的記憶點是Elton John的神級客串，至於這一部前傳，則壓根不應該存在。從《X戰警：第一戰》到《王牌特工：起源》，10年間，Matthew Vaughn對於戰爭的思考，從對人類間的信任危機退步到如過家家般愚蠢幼稚，在歷史是可操控和不可控兩種史觀之間的反復橫跳，而延續系列前兩部的父子情刻畫也顯得潦草，更讓人失望的是惡意賣腐，治腿的一段戲已經讓我產生生理不適了。
恶搞没问题，一上来戏仿《1917》和俄国皇宫刺杀都挺好笑的，但致命伤在于你以为它是正剧的时候它告诉你只是恶搞，你抱着恶搞的心态往下看它又想回归正剧，稍微严肃一点的战争戏就拍得跟过家家一样，到最后情绪不知道该落在哪，两部分都很糟糕。其实最疑惑的是为什么放着前两部现成的剧情和人物架构不用，非要开发这么个没意思的前传草草收场，挺可惜的。
放低期待值之后没有想象的那么难了，也符合王男一贯嘴上manners maketh man，实际nothing really matters的“虚无”世界观，特别是这个源起居然是个父承子志的故事，玩笑开得有点漂亮。可惜我们古迪老师出场太少了…p.s. 看评论区把爆米花片上升到历史课，搁那儿上纲上线地破防，真是比电影本身还精彩啊哈哈哈哈哈
剧情实在是太弱了，而且架空历史都没架到点子上，看似玩得最凶的只能做彩蛋，这有啥意思啊？
太难看了，期待了一年，怎么会写成这么一个前半段无聊后半段陈词滥调的剧本。反派是谁简直一看cast就能猜到，三段式的剧本在第一个小时的打斗之后就泄气，儿子的战场段落更是毫无意义。男主部分时候笨拙部分时候又身手矫健，男配女配都是工具人。反派杀手除了第一个疯子打斗段落很有新意，女杀手30秒就结束了。一星给最后片尾小枝的measure of a man。
“你替我挡子弹，却不肯跳机？”
随便拉出个演员都是响当当的演技派，为什么非要接这个烂摊子？马修·沃恩一定是疯了，彻头彻尾的意淫。
两倍速都看不下去。唯一亮点是拉斯普京1v3那场戏，找回一点kingsman的感觉
打斗场面比前作确实差了一点，不过还是标准的英式幽默
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
