剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 官青易 6小时前 :

    个人感觉,这是最近看过的国产爱情片里为数不多让人不出戏的,电影两位主演毛晓彤和杨玏演技都比较真实,对白剧情也很符合普通大众的生活,非常能带入和共情,比较推荐情侣一起去看下,可以增加互相了解的机会。

  • 云安和 4小时前 :

    感情爆发的几场戏演员的表演乏善可陈 剧本很俗套 男女主很搭 配乐很精致 很多小细节做得很可爱 及格线以上

  • 卫美华 6小时前 :

    怎么说呢?就是看到狗,会觉得结尾会死,看到玻璃玩具,结尾会碎,在一起的很简单,在一起那些事情很模式,两个人都没有什么责任感和体谅心,大家喊着要分手的时候我就想快分手吧,我不想你们在一起啊,唯一好的事情就是两个演员能看见去,但是再久点就不行了,充分证明了,中国大部分爱情片还是停留在CP感上。

  • 愚灵秀 2小时前 :

    看过三十而已后对主演俩演cp觉得毫无违和感,但是剧本太普通甚至差劲了,三星全给毛晓彤吧!题外话,人类的悲喜本不相通,我好像懂里面大部分的敏感情绪,也懂一开始的一见倾心到最后的握手言和,但也仅仅是我懂,有的观者关注的是他们生活的其它面,感受永远比真实重要,感受也永远无法用文字完全倾诉。

  • 同飞兰 3小时前 :

    看他俩谈恋爱真的好累…

  • 凌季萌 6小时前 :

    恋爱最开始的时候都是甜的,哪怕一通电话、一起买菜、一起坐公交都是幸福和美好的回忆,可当时间慢慢沉淀,两个人从性格、职业到家庭上的分歧也会开始分散两个人的精力,这个时候更需要两个人互相理解、相互扶持。

  • 彩蕾 8小时前 :

    虽然男生有很多事情做得温暖又贴心,比如就算应酬到很晚也记得买感冒药,但是光他说要养宠物后期又丢给女主照料这一点就很恶心了,以宠物类比孩子是个很好的切入点,国内家庭大多数应该都经历过小孩生病,母亲一个人照顾,父亲迟迟赶来后还要轻飘飘指责母亲没有照顾好孩子,好像男人的生活中只有自己的事情最主要,自己的工作最重要,女人的辛苦与努力不值一提

  • 崔秋英 2小时前 :

    挺真实的,是不是大部分人的爱情与婚姻都这样呢,还是单身保平安那。《三十而已》既视感嘛。

  • 卷浩波 0小时前 :

    但是,北漂过的人太懂这个故事里所有的情绪与遭遇了,两位演的挺好的,虽然爱情戏不太成熟,那就不成熟吧,谁二十几岁谈的恋爱多理智成熟呢。

  • 慈德业 9小时前 :

    看到了作,看到了自我和食言,并没有太多相濡以沫…可能片中没有太多的狗血,有的是一些鸡毛蒜皮的小事,会让部分观众感同身受,是不给两星的原因…

  • 东方夏旋 6小时前 :

    我们的现代爱情故事能不能写实点啊?!

  • 城修为 3小时前 :

    剧情老套,毫无新意,无感,还有能不能少点鸡汤

  • 卫泓成 0小时前 :

    以年为单位,以白头偕老为目的,以你为主语,这就是爱情!

  • 初钰 0小时前 :

    最后结尾还是蛮不错的,情感推上去了。但矛盾点的引发有点过于普通了。

  • 东方鸿文 3小时前 :

    我以为是岁岁年年,没想到就是一年。而且讲故事的能力太差了。而且男主角总觉得各方面都差点儿意思,也就毛晓彤的甜值这两星了。

  • 扈哲瀚 9小时前 :

    就是说 这是一部看可以不看也可以 情侣最好不看的电影 挺真实的 但是又很言情 现实里没有这种痴情的男人吧(反正我不信 毛晓彤好甜 又感觉 带着面具模式化笑容没有微微里面真实

  • 振初 8小时前 :

    挺尬的。如果不是蔡健雅唱的插曲,就不來看的。

  • 彤沛 4小时前 :

    切 还是有人不懂安全感是什么🙄

  • 在幻玉 2小时前 :

    毛晓彤这里颜值和演技都发挥出来了,比在其他作品中好。虽然结构简单不像个电影,可是很有感觉,真实感营造出来了,BGM也可以,有前任三的气质,事情都都是有代表性的,也逻辑自洽,娓娓道来循序渐进,情侣的生活以及争吵度很有代入感,尽管没什么新意,可是毛晓彤那两句爆发争吵突破了自己。不像多数其他现代爱情片一样一定要有遗憾或者伤春悲秋疼痛文学的悲剧结尾,导致每次看到这样的电影都以为是爱情悲剧,这个年代还能拍出配着BGM回头奔向你的剧情,我个人是认可的,谁叫我本身就喜欢积极向上的心态呢,这就是故事,没必要一定要悲到让你哭死,现实不可避免,浪漫至死不渝。以年为单位,以白头偕老为目的,以你为主语,这就是爱情,给爱情下了定义,不管对不对,至少浪漫。片尾的小视频可以的,如果是在电影院会很有趣。这个分数略低了。

  • 侨彭魄 9小时前 :

    成功代入自己,重庆,广东,只是没在北京,后面哭的看完,但总感觉电影矛盾冲突还是不够扎心,有种强行分开的感觉,过去的一年我倒底经历了什么啊……电影是大团圆结局了,而我还是面对现实吧,跨年夜电影院看的,元旦快乐!

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved