Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
所以为什么临到世界末日一群年轻人却在天天跑酷啊——我完全是出于对这叠buff一样的卡司表的包容才把这个问题忽视过去，我看我才是爱的战士
童话+人类起源是日本动画的味道了…画面和音乐完全top水平
然后就是再一次证明网飞日本都是饭桶。泡泡和螺旋都理不清还搁这高概念呢。
使出浑身解数融合“人鱼公主/塞壬”两个同源原型（最后想当然地落脚在了人鱼公主的悲剧，真就俗到底呗），全片充斥着名为“轻盈”的奇观（好像运动可以忽略重量一样），让人完全感觉不到人物、景观的重量，城市跑酷要是人人都能一跳三层楼高还有何吸引力可言？
每次我打一星的时候都遗憾为什么不能负分。充满光污染的精美垃圾。
浪费了wit这么强的制作资源啊....还真让nbht预测中了，就是仿新海诚的圈钱作品，有点心疼netflix，给日本这帮动画公司投了这么多钱，出来的玩意有一个扑一个
有几个过于3d和韩系作画的特写太出戏了。制作流畅归流畅，但我真的好累。
正如标题，泡泡很美，但泡泡再美始终还是泡泡，一戳就破。
我第一次遇见和配音这么违和的脸，宫野真守的声线和老大哥完全不符啊。所以泡泡为什么会降临东京？这一场虚幻而华丽的场景就这样不清不楚地结束了。部分特写画面柔光滤镜添加得亲妈不认，就算你们不要剧情只要画面也该适度啊。
主旨是：不要靠近男人，会变得不幸（
配泽野的违和感很强，到处都是燃烧的经费，但就是缺了点什么，这点什么特别重要。
这。。。不太行啊。。。故事不行，人设一般般，二维人物跟三维场景严重割裂感，像是p上去的。全程感觉霸权社用新海诚的画风搞了个跑酷版立体机动装置。请了一堆大神，就这？还是说大神们的化学反应不太行适得其反？and 还是尽量找声优来配音吧，志尊淳台词不太行啊。
《噪音》剧情讲述在猪狩岛这座落后又人口严重外移的孤岛上，青年泉圭太(藤原龙也 饰)生产的黑无花果受到高度评价，就在地方创生推进局决定给予小岛5亿圆特别辅助金、岛民看见希望征兆之时，名为小御坂睦雄(渡边大知 饰)的男人突然出现，岛上和平的日常瞬间天翻地覆。
我们成功阻止了第二次冲击。再看《海兽之子》简直就是神作。（2022-04-28）
好喜欢啊。人有一颗会感到寂寞的心，也有着一颗会去爱的心。
四个业界内的"大神"搞了个低配新海诚,估计新海诚今年那部应该会碾了这部。
这个版本的新海诚更趋近于《天气之子》
叙述上，虽然画面很唯美，但是剧情部分太少，反而像是加长版音乐mv，配角除了喜欢大姐的队长和惹事小孩外其他队员没任何印象，有这个一个半小时多的时长都不够刻画好BB的人物吗？
霸权社：用心做了，全员兵长，卡点卡得很老道
作为一个半月板已经无了的患者看这番可真是膝盖一路疼hhhhhh。。。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
