Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
尝试是值得鼓励的，但最终做出来的不是各种类型的集大成，而是四不像。打灯情节把科幻彻底变成玄幻，泛滥的煽情戏码让人哭笑不得。沈马之间的感情戏真的有必要吗？把男主角写死真的有必要吗？一眼让人想起火星救援，但科幻部分没法比就不说了，居然连让人真心发笑的次数也比不上，确实叫人遗憾。
冲着沈腾看的… 前一半很搞笑 后一半没必要
有笑点，讲了个好故事，特效部分很美，超级浪漫，一个人的英雄也是英雄
月球部分还行，地球部分稀糟，喜剧里为什么一定要靠煽情升华主题？你们这些演员真的相信自己掉下的眼泪是出于故事本身而不是技巧吗？
一般，最多三颗心，7.5分，开心麻花算是黔驴技穷了。袋鼠是全片最大的亮点。
剧情缝合怪，桥段全老梗，表达强煽情，100%含腾率也救不了这片的难看。
不是每个人都会自动带入这对cp，也不是每个人都相信含腾两百分百就是好片
它唯一传递出有信息量的内容就是，在一个时刻标榜中心论的地方，从来都是不讲科学的。
地球上的人类举起手电筒的那一幕直接对标迪迦 这种相互的大爱片段我一向抵抗不了 据朋友说漫画是没有爱情桥段的 但沈叔叔的演技为情节增色不少 开始看漫画！
5、人物根本没立住，最后壮烈牺牲的猛煽情，只想让人快进；
难得见到沈腾诚恳且有层次的表演，结局OK，没有落入英雄归来的俗套。
OMG! OMG! This is not a comedy.
好难看…中间看睡着了 作为喜剧片笑点完全不密集 科幻片逻辑漏洞太多 催泪的地方也不够催泪 倒是挺爱放歌 一整个太空主题大型mv…开心麻花 请专注喜剧 谢谢🙏
除了最后撞向π＋，我始终不明白直播沈腾的生活画面有什么意义，导致所有相关笑点都给我一种在隔着屏幕挠人胳肢窝的感觉
沈腾自有沈腾的蜕变，麻花自有麻花的停滞不前，视效真的做得很不错，但喜剧作为麻花的当家招牌，不该被如此忽视，尤其是这么大的投资，类型上难道不应该更保稳么？题材和手法想要突破没有问题，但不该拿这种片子开刀，尤其是都挂上沈马的金字招牌了，难道不知道观众想看什么吗？
当月球版《黄河的水干了》响起的时候，感觉被意外落在月球的独孤月既悲凉又好笑，配乐太妙了
电影前2/3段节奏很好，笑点很足，还有很多和开心麻花其他电影联动的小彩蛋。这部科幻喜剧电影虽然重心落在喜剧上，但科幻也没有崩坏（特别是追赶太阳那段）。
一部含腾量100%的电影，在我看来，它其实是一部科幻电影，而融入了轻喜剧的元素，让人看的十分舒服，十分完整。
沈腾自己上还是能打一打的，但country road让我觉得很尬。20220728@百老汇MOMA2号厅E3-4
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
