Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
2，这个系列在中国电影院上映简直就是最大的讽刺，第一部尸体埋在新盖的警察局下面；这一部的揭发市长，整个一条贪腐官场……结果都只能设定在泰国，因为在国内屁大点事都要捂嘴，别说市长了，你连卫生局长都不能揭发……结果还要在国内上，简直是羞辱！
如果要靠杀人放火引起关注寻求帮助那么这个世界没救了吧
陈思诚的片子总是让我想起姜文。姜文号称要“站着把钱赚了”，而陈思诚是真正做到跪着把屎吃了。
94'这一切本来就不公平，我们可以为了生活忍气吞声，可以接受卑微地活着，但是他们不能像虫子一样把我们随意踩死，
修了一些旧版不太合理的地方，但加了个重要人物和改动了一些故事线让漏洞更多了（扶额）；很多笑点改没了，包括那个加速药水，话痨狗竟然是梶裕贵配音但台词不够旧版好玩；连〈少年期〉也要删我的 TAT 不过新版特效做得真好（一人包场看完。
优缺点都明显。救孩子这个最连通观众的情感点很扎实。贫富不公阶级固化变成架空环境商业片的卖座之道这事儿本身有点魔幻，但也恰因为真正想要针砭时弊的文艺片及报告文学都被堵死了才得以让此类商业片“聪明”地产生了。没有那么真实的集体情绪出口是不是出口呢？观众判断。但就这一部中间的一些情节硬伤比如手术室的电话铃声可以听到让瞬间我已经有点不关心主题的那部分了。
PS:这尼玛我咋觉得都像抄的《纸钞屋》+《我忘了是啥但是情节很像的电影》，得绝症父母千万别救我！
这个系列的影片概括下来，就是机智地对付censorship，用一个自以为机智的故事或者剧本刻画一个机智的底层人物，再用一个看似机智的方式获得观众的同情与支持。但大可以再真诚点，不要如此精准（机智）地抓住观众的买点，所以看完我很困惑，影片声张的以及渲染的到底是正义还是票房。
陈思诚还是很聪明的，电影发展了一百多年，商业片想要讲出新意本来就很难了，为什么不干脆放弃原创，直接翻拍呢？翻拍的同时再蹭一波前作的IP影响力，商业价值不就来了吗？这种算计确实是非常聪明也非常有效的，还真得陈思诚来干才行，其他人拉不下来这个脸。
对小人物情感描绘很深入，悲情成分让人发现黑暗中的一丝光明。
虽然，没有第一部好看。但是依旧是一部完成度很高同期没有更好看的电影的作品。不得不感慨一句：文咏珊的资源太好啦。
没必要还起名叫误杀，很多细节经不起推敲了，勉强及格。
6.5/10，误杀第一部精彩的地方主要是在悬疑反转，不是父爱如山
好行货，看了1/3就想结局一定是父亲被乱枪打死，孩子得救，没想到的是心脏还能大能小，成了一个保大还是保小的问题
不符合逻辑的地方也太多了点吧 不过为父爱的伟大点赞 5.8分
老角色卡点发现新疑点，卡点走向下一关，新角色卡点出现，卡点提供提供新“反转”。连重要物件线索都是卡点提供卡点发现。卡的什么点？摄影机对准他们的点。
真的表达不出来一点儿稍微深刻的传播方面的意义，而且记者妹子这个角色虽然本来就比较刻板印象但是演员也演的真的不好
我愿称之为《翻杀2之卡点来劲》，群众卡点倒戈为主角喊冤，后又卡点倒戈警察，根据需要反复横跳；卡点闹事，喊口号，卡点堵车子，卡点又倒戈主角。
那一天，匹里卡星回忆起了被巨人们支配的恐惧。
说着泰语场景里的文字却是乱造的；背景在泰国却人人会讲汉语还操着一口蹩脚的泰语......
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
