Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
领主，骑士，铁甲，战矛，决斗，血腥，一部到处彰显男性荷尔蒙爆发的电影，却是在为女性哀鸣和申诉。期待小变态提名奥斯卡。
同一段故事三个人的叙述视角，画风很权力游戏，jodie太赞了！
就算是adam driver又怎样?最后还不是要被果体示众~~~本来以为是个动作片片，其实是一个关于人性和欲望的片子~哪有什么真爱，在那个年代背景下女性地位真是可悲~女主好美!
此片也试图巨细靡遗地以高保真还原14世纪的众生风貌，欣赏原汁原味之外更有诸多细节耐人寻味，比如：①佳人的小黑狗，主人回来会吠，“良人”光临却不吭声；②大帅哥的小跟班在裁判所有一次（爽笑）特写，在角斗场有两次，事后就……最好别……
-“雷爷爷厌男” -“他是厌男还是厌人” 😂😂
我说前两个男性视角怎么看得让人焦躁，那不就是两个同事在年终kpi考核述职的时候，拼命粉饰自己，抹黑别人？
科幻伦理片，马赫沙拉·阿里的演技很棒。细想一下，这项技术也许对家人很好，但让患者一个人孤独地在疗养区等死，是不是有点太残忍了，家人的临终关怀应该也挺重要的。
至于对比血腥，一种是大家看得见，一种是只有自己看得见，甚至更残酷。
最后男主胜利围观妇女为男女主夫妇鼓掌那里真是莫大的讽刺
Apple TV 出品“黑镜”系列之《天鹅挽歌》
很喜欢这种强设定的概念，人为制造一个困境，再拷问人心，道德和伦理。只是故事后来没顶上去。
雷德利·斯科特宝刀不老。电影在不同视角回忆之下保持主干吻合而细节撼动观感乃至事件本质这一点做得相当不错，能看出每个人都在保持大体诚实然后有意或无意地为自己辩解，不过这俩男的在对待女人方面显然是虚伪地美化自己。最后一场决斗戏非常精彩，从三位主角到围观的国王贵族贫民各个立场和阶层的刻画都简洁到位，马达和司机打架的部分也是逻辑清晰剪辑流畅又血脉贲张，结尾部分雷德利拍出来的人情味和娱乐性多一点，我是非常愿意站队玛格丽特的，换库布里克的话可以想象“愚蠢人类”的上帝视角审视会更突出
又看了一遍，如果杰克后来发现，妻子也是备份的…。片子不是硬科幻但是情感推动精致细腻，结果并不重要，重要的是观看过程中引起的思考，如果是你又会如果选择，如果你是主角的家人如何接受和难过。
玛格丽特是不幸的，因为两个男人都无非把她当做占有物来玩弄，但她同时也是幸运的，因为她活了下了，得以说出自己的故事。可以说是雷公版本的《切腹》，对patriarchy的完美讥讽，真正的人性诗篇。
眼神里都是戏～非常温馨的科幻电影，本以为这么高科技如此像《黑镜》会是惊悚剧情hhh
同一段故事三个人的叙述视角，画风很权力游戏，jodie太赞了！
看了三分之一我终于知道为什么票房低了，用多重视角来讲故事我觉得完全没问题，但是这个故事本身用多重视角其实并不增加可看性或者趣味性，它开始讲第二遍的时候我都觉得有点难以接受。但老雷做导演的功力还是强的，而且演员们也都很老练，剧本是本马达联手写的这已经很不常见了。
最后，落到了metoo的女权主义，实在是太陈旧了。
朱迪·科默、马特·达蒙、亚当·德赖弗众星贡献了一场精彩的中世纪的丑闻大戏！雷老爷子果然从不失手，最后半小时两个男人为了所谓荣誉与正义的丑陋对决将整部电影推向戏剧高潮，也是本片第一主人公marguerite命运的高潮，不过结尾将死之时的亚当说出的那句疑似忏悔的话确实让人意味深长，不知道是否有意为之。但很显然，没有人是胜利者
Respect the subject and all the design and stuff but nothing more.
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
