Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
我小时候看的大熊这么蠢的嘛？🌚就不用变小能处理的事。非要……没有新的剧情了嘛。奶牛猫是真的惨。末世先杀圣母是对的。
不管多少歲看哆啦A夢，還是有和童年時候一樣的感動，童年果然是最浪漫的年紀。沒想到會是一個反極權反獨裁的動漫，太有意義了，那些畫像簡直是big brother is watching you.帕比看似完美，但是人無完人，實際上有個致命的缺陷，就是太過於善良，不想連累其他人，寧肯自己吃虧，也不願讓朋友吃虧。或許就是因為這樣才被人民愛戴，選舉成了總統，卻又因此不太適合做總統，因為太過善良和固執。結尾的「天賜我自由」太震撼了，傷害、奴役人民的人，自然不可能被人民信任。
结局前的二十分钟比较有趣。反派嗓音永远丝滑迷人，于声控是一种危险的诱惑。
对小学生刚刚好，对2022年的成年人还是幼稚了些。
剧情有加长
追求所谓的漫画感故意把人物画残，手握大把新技术（EMP、永远有90%电量开启NFC又不会挤坏身体的坦克）又水了一部新片。为了捧带资进组的新角色，砍掉了许多精彩的铺垫细节，片长不减信息量减半，再次拍出“没看明白就掏钱买我小说”的效果，为什么就不能找一位爱哆啦A梦的编剧来改编呢～滋溜走路多少年的脚都被改成129.3kg直接砸地了！这位佐藤犬应该是没看(懂)《1984》的，他把互相制约的体制改成愚蠢的独裁首领，把暴动的群众改成只会喊口号游行的肉盾，把话痨狗改成敌人让停就提前停的吉祥物，削弱外星人的智慧、缩小鲸鱼的尺寸（一如既往地继承水田版“地球人类最厉害”的迷之自信），生怕吓到小朋友，但静香却改成爱好粉嫩又自带淡绿。内地配音十分钟内两次故意讲“蓝胖子”（藤新导演）
越是宣揚altruism，越是說明現實中的匱乏，沒有/不計成本的付出真的是最值得頌揚的嗎？這部電影這麼多影射怎麼過審的？太邪惡了 ！！！以及京東到底是給了多少贊助才設計出這樣一個醜出天際的吉祥物？好久沒去實體影城觀影了。at UME_BB
没老版好看，都没有致敬金刚
看到了“ducaizhe”这样的词，感觉在这里公映太应景了，很棒😀
同样是年更为什么蜡笔小新剧场版的质量能经久不衰，本该更具创造力想象力的哆啦a梦剧场版却每年都在吃老本和质量下滑呢
大环境和剧情发展都有点扯
本打算和女儿一起怀怀旧的，结果看了一部政治教育片。剧情很差，但政治正确，适合当下的中国人呀，哈哈哈！天赐我们自由，但依然必须自己去努力争取才能得到呀！
8岁以上不推荐观看
可能是我老了嘛 弟弟妹妹挺喜欢的 也有可能去年的伴我同行更适合我 所以并没有很喜欢这一部。
低幼是真低幼，还是老生常谈的友情、勇气、团结，时长一个半小时就可以了，看到飞向太空以后困意来袭，靠包里备着的山楂片抵挡。想起去年看的那部宝可梦，也是困得不行。
比较讶异的是，哆啦A梦宇宙篇探讨了「自由」，匹里卡星的篡位者的巨幅画像如同《1984》里的电幕，时时刻刻盯着人们的一举一动。
新版我可以看（哭
看的时候感觉，这是可以播的吗，题材非常绝，海报很有奥威尔那个小说的感觉，那个角色很像那个谁
小孩子的电影，就用小孩子的心态去看吧，别做一个烦人的大人。
绝对是成功的改编，相比原版更胜一筹，甚至对原版的细微改编还升华了主题，果然哆啦剧场版重制从不让我失望。（反观近些年欧美的各种翻拍，真是让人无语）
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
