Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
女性要对违背自己意愿的任何行为，大声说不。而法庭上并不需要女权战士，任何有情感色彩的，有疑惑的判断，都违背法律公平原则。
亚当的父亲创造了“灰色地带”来诋毁米拉，但当问到如果被性侵的是自己的女儿时却毫不犹豫地说“杀了他”，真是双标得够厉害，从侧面描写了一位功成名就的男性是如何蔑视女性的（影片花了大量篇幅来描绘他是如何诱奸女实习生的）。 各位，大家一定要牢记米拉的辩护律师的这句话；“沉默不代表同意”！
罗翔老师详细的说个这个问题。女性表示出不就是不。现实中的问题是，男的可以不承认女性有表示出不。
导演结尾的最后一个镜头就是我的答案。
可惜专门为了甘斯布小姐跑了一个小时去看首映场，结果只来了她儿子和老公，不管咋样，值了
章子怡和徐峥真的可以 有深度 有个性 可惜另一半真的不行了……
最喜欢徐峥这组，小品比较成熟了。章子怡镜头表达比较浪漫，从孩子的视角来讲航天也不错。沈腾的就是好笑，笑完不留啥
最让我惊喜的是徐峥使用的韦斯安德森的手法。我们从影视剧中接触到的上个世纪七八十年代几乎都是写实画风，粗糙的布料加上老气的配色，总给人一种灰扑扑的尘土气息。我并不认为不该这样，只是觉得应该用更多元的方式去重现历史。毕竟一切历史都是当代史，对过去的再现往往会融入当下美学理论，如今的欧美剧已经有了成熟的手法使得在拍摄任何时代时都能展现时代的美，像《权力的游戏》中粗粝的中世纪风格、《血战钢锯岭》、《1917》中油画般的二战年代。美是一种重要的东西，在潜移默化中改变人们的认知。当展现历史的技术更加成熟，人们可能会更加乐于接受历史
不同视角的切换和不同立场下的选择以及看似模糊的真相，这些都实实在在地构成了les choses humaines
控辩双方律师给人印象十分深刻。辩方律师是司法指定的，竟然全力以赴为男孩辩护，控方律师则是一位漂亮、干练的女律师。双方最后陈词很精彩。
程序正义还是结果正义？道德还是法律？一个人还是一群人的电车难题，我还在琢磨，估计这辈子也琢磨不到真理。但我知道只要万劫不复的人类还在，我还在其中之一，一个最保底良性的社会就应该让绝大多数人有生活而不只是活着的朝气，有反对而不只是妥协的勇气，有不断向上追求而不是无止境向下兼容的生机。
吴京单元的布景和打斗太假了，强行煽情最为致命
导演看似挑战了一个无法说清的复杂命题，但其实立场鲜明地早已下了定论，当“到底有没有发生”的争论降格为“说不愿意就是不愿意”的结论时本片前两个小时的双线叙事和种种铺垫的意义基本也就没有了，而最后结尾直接将答案拍到观众脑门上的处理更是彻底暴露了导演的投机：貌似一直理中客的那个人原来是个拉偏架的
喜欢子怡的part，沈腾的最难看。其他两个还行
不能因为tv烂就对剧场版放低要求，主角团演技真的又烂又尬，别再说什么演员尽力了，还是期待5月新曼吧
结案陈词很精彩 作为女性还是觉得男的要有起码的尊重 不能觉得她愿意就是愿意
宇航员的诗让人瞬间泪奔，中国航天靠多少代的努力奉献才走到今日，感动感恩，故事2能打个4星，但无奈其它故事都太拉垮
四平八穩。武居真的會拍人物，比TV像活人。文戲也比TV好多了。最後SMILE的意義，變成光意義都給補完了。是成功救場的例子。
比tv好看多了！！！彰人：烦死了！23333
纠缠期间的年轻男女各有罗生门的可恨和可怜之处，但最大的凶手却是逍遥法外的大记者父亲，视角有意思
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
