Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
小品界的MTV，其实还是很不错的。观众想看的，都照顾到了～
和所谓的大制作相比，至少用心了，爱笑的风格还是没变
二星吧也就，唉，每个包袱出现的都在意料之中，唯一妹想到的是每个包袱翻得太快了，所以只能算是个长篇小品吧。最重要的是这种电影的走向到最后都是一个强行煽情，恕我实在无法自我感动。
还挺有意思的，起码一个故事讲下来了，比那些花里胡哨的大电影强多了。小烧烤必须支持一下啊。就是这个结局的反转感觉有点突然。
全片2分无新意，只有男主老婆的那句台词：“两个工作你选一个，选一个自己喜欢的。”那个片段瞬间泪目。这大概就是真正爱你的人吧。老爷子不愧是老戏骨，唯一一个演技在线的。
看电影最开始的目的，一个无脑的故事，一堆无聊但是可笑的笑料，有美女，有帅哥，没有什么政治正确，没有什么使命，没有什么煽情。这，才是电影，最开始的样子。
比很多院线电影好看，不过后面20分钟太啰嗦了。挺好一个故事
制片国家/地区: 中国大陆
比很多院线喜剧都强，挺有意思，记录我们的时代。看影评学到术语「荷兰角」，查资料说，当你在你的构图中使用斜线（道路、走廊、等公交车的队伍）, 你都是在二维电影画面中营造三维空间感。
5.8少了点吧，最起码不是特别2，认真在拍
笑点蛮多的，剧情也流畅，演员阵容不变哈哈哈，没想到佳佳做导演还挺上道，还不错
整体有些刻意，很难说这种片子是否完全合理，但的确在当下的我来看是有触动，记得拒绝别人的时候要说对不起，记得要做梦，记得除了自己没人会让自己失望。
我就一个普通老百姓，看完觉得挺逗的，看的挺开心
还可以吧，东北不能失去烧烤，就像西方不能失去耶路撒冷
当🌈闪耀迪士尼的时候 丑陋软的政治正确已经达到让人不舒服的地步了
看电影最开始的目的，一个无脑的故事，一堆无聊但是可笑的笑料，有美女，有帅哥，没有什么政治正确，没有什么使命，没有什么煽情。这，才是电影，最开始的样子。
现在导演门槛真的低啊，东北大款都去三亚买房这个梗是真硬核啊
挺好看的。过程精彩。任何事情都要想办法解决。只要想办法，就会有出路。
太赞了太赞了！！惊喜啊惊喜！！看的我只想现在来顿烧烤！！！！什么烤串大腰子都安排上！
中规中矩，表演的痕迹重了点。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
