Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
①既然福尔摩斯在当代的文化语境中被不断重组，为什么波罗就一定要符合原旨主义呢？
把破案片改成又臭又长的肥皂言情剧，还真有创意，糟蹋经典的创意。一星只给画面。2
整体质感不错，就是最终答案揭晓的那会儿情绪没有调动起来
后面几个查问嫌疑人的片段比较好，整体糟透了，许多没用的故事线和莫名其妙的镜头。
充满了让人反感的做作和匠气。好比如一定要给手枪一个特写，一定要设计棱形玻璃门窗并透过它拍人物关系，仿佛学到的每一个技巧都要运用进来。还夹杂着黑人议题，同性恋内容，阶级差异，但是都浅尝辄止，透着投机的意味。所有表演都很表面，盖尔加朵除了赚钱以外也该考虑自己选片的角色定位了。
我第一次看电影被电影本身剧透了。。。痴情女对着波洛说自己演查米恩，富家女演克里奥特帕拉，这不明摆着已经告诉你凶手是谁了吗？正是女仆杀死了埃及艳后啊，无语，删掉这个桥段就好了
首先震惊一刀未剪
觉得还行吧！主要是原著故事真的很精彩！让我再次想起来，我要去看阿婆的剩下几本没看过的原著小说了。
22_044。看得心塞，也许是粉丝滤镜，日常觉得阿婆的改编只要照着书改拍出来就不会差，不过每个编剧都喜欢大改特改。这里竟然给波洛（话说我还以为翻译成“波洛”应该是中文地区通用的了怎么我看这版本是翻译成白罗的？）安排了感情戏，还是俩段？谁会对这个感兴趣啊。而且波洛竟然还有追逐戏，顿时一时”XX大侦探“的称号在我脑海里浮现，这不是波洛好吗！然后非常zzzc地安排了黑人和同性恋（也真是相当翻白眼了），最不可忍的就是把波洛对富家女的批评给去掉了，这可是原作我相当喜欢的一段，干嘛导演，三个人谁都有错好吗
可以但没必要系列。演杰奎琳的那个演员明显就是制片方本想请玛格特·罗比但钱没到位找的备胎吧哈哈哈！最后推理巴啦啦讲这么快是生怕我们看过原版吗？！
虽然将原著里的二次行凶分成了三次，导致波洛的后续行为产生了诸多不合理的bug，但对于初次观看这个故事的观众，不细想的情况下也不会影响观感。其次就是最后的推理过程实在过于仓促，节奏的把控算不上高明。
居然用了一半的篇幅做案发前的铺垫，作为侦探片这节奏掌控是不是也太随意了点。。。不过比起前作“东方列车”，多了不少风光可看，还挺美的….
开场十分钟先来一段一战，搞得我以为进错场，不知道自己看的是什么，看完之后我才发现，全片最好的部分居然是那十分钟。
盖尔加朵真的和taylor swift长得一模一样……平铺直叙，台词现代，质感奇怪，差点意思。
好家伙，观影前就猜测，新版应该会加点同性之情，种族问题啥的，竟然全中!基本成了这几年好莱坞翻拍的标配了。和上部一样，波罗再次展现了动作追逐戏，这次他还加了感情戏，而且是两段! 期待未来马普尔小姐有翻拍，老太太手持双枪，肉搏歹徒!
为什么豆瓣不能打零分，真的求求导演不要再拍阿婆了，能把阿婆的作品拍的这么烂也是没谁了
I despise this egocentric and incompetent director with his equally arrogant and fragile Poirot with anger management issues. Awful and torturing to watch. Luckily my group won't fall for the same trap again. And get your dirty hands off Agatha Christie's books!
和东方快车谋杀案、贝尔法斯特一样烂，无力吐槽，拍啥呢，虽然是我老公可能的银幕谢幕之作，我老公真的好帅呀。
6.8 相比无人生还和东方列车谋杀案，这个电影的剧本貌似稍微有一点点弱，推理的高潮，仿佛都在故意给每个人找一个嫌疑，然而有些人的嫌疑又有些无力，让人一眼就能看透只是“工具人”而已。同时，影片用了大量的时间来刻画各种爱情，反而推理的部分有些薄弱了。电影整体画面的美感、演员的张力、电影的配乐都还不错，尤其是尼罗河上大场面的旖旎风光，给影片增色不少。
看完之后特别想出国去埃及。剧情什么的都是浮云
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
