Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
造型很棒小男孩演的很好，景色很美，结尾那个海滩看着像温哥华hhhh但是所谓的恶魔也太容易死了吧？？有点下头
不知所云，故弄玄虚，故事就很简单父亲矿洞感染病毒传染其中一个儿子，另外一个儿子各种迷之作死像个智障害死n多人，女主全程酱油到最后靠主角光环杀死鹿角怪物，前中后期都很拉跨，硬要搞得那么复杂，还有病毒来源和缘由也没个说明，枪打不死靠插死就扯蛋...没看的别浪费时间...
和小青一起看。邪恶力量里面的windigo不吓人actually。
-怪物有点帅，但是故事却不咋地。
漏洞百出啊，还有最搞得就是这么恐怖的情况女主竟然敢只身一人往矿洞里走，多特么吓人啊，跑都来不及还自己往里走，不现实嘛
老套到家了，美式恐怖片真的后继无人，玩来玩去全是同一套陈词滥调。
近期多是看一些没营养的商业大片，这种台词镜头有一定讲究的恐怖片还是能带来一点舒适感，虽然高潮戏比较崩。
只是剧情也太散了，太尴尬了，空架子。
大处有视野小处见细节 段子一箩筐 多加一星疫情的独特共鸣
就算是小学女教师单挑怪物，片子无聊就是无聊。倒是片中小镇风景如画。
最近的片子怎么都这副德行，恐怖片也拍得这么拖沓！
怎么说，有点拖，不过怪物也没有遮遮掩掩的。我看的温迪戈传说是只有吃了人肉才会变，被抓伤不会感染。
整个基调非常悲伤，一对兄妹，拯救孩子，孩子拯救家人的故事。
期待了好久的美式恐怖，有点失望诶…从内容到氛围营造《鹿角》做的都不够出色，和同期的影片相比，感觉差了好多…
连其中讽刺都看不出来 觉得不好笑的 不如就别看电影了 看看猴子洗澡的短视频吧
摄影被烂剧本来回拖累…导致一切都显得笨拙愚蠢
Kill me，我不是说这部电影是垃圾，我是说最近网飞出的电影，都是垃圾
导演是真的沉不住气，视角得混乱导致全片的悬疑感尽失，基本上警察和老师的探案线就一点效果都没有，因为每次小男孩的戏份都会前置于这些侦察戏，让观众都知道发生了什么之后，并不是结果导向，而是仍当作谜团抛给观众，并且还有许多其实可以放在更后面的桥段，比如关于父亲刚被寄生的戏份，还要刻意用一段改变画幅的段落来作为回忆，总之就是情节编排和剪辑真的不行。而同时主题又很模糊，怪物的设定其实是有些环保主义和自然主义，对于人类破坏自然的反噬，但是除了这个设定本身，全片小男孩生活和小镇的展现却完全没有跟环保主义沾边，如果你要设定成这是一个靠挖矿而生的小镇都还好说，反倒就一群正常镇民突然被一个毫不沾边的怪物给迫害了，托罗可能只提供了怪物设计吧（有点感慨的就是这片子在疫情前就在电影院看了预告，如今快两年了才终于看到）
工整烂俗的商品电影，大熊宝熊吃小熊，你鹿角怪不是回瞬移吗？小黑棚那里“突然到你身后”两次，最后怎么那么拉的……真的很反感这种分镜服务感官而忽略真实性的伎俩
题材不错，画风也比较喜欢就是太暗了，这个剧情和运镜哦...
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
