A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
我是个容易共情的观众，因为一个细节被打动就不再挑肥拣瘦。但是月骑让我发现他们不缺聪明的编剧，莫比亚斯就像是走了个过场，试试水，看能不能完成后面的蜘蛛毒液联动来捞金，这样浪费演员的电影，其心可诛！
所以DC和漫威是平行宇宙吗，蜘蛛侠串起了两个宇宙
跟《毒液2》的结构太相似了，仍然是除了特效和演技一无是处的电影，剧情太过尴尬，配角毫无存在价值，以及反派塑造的性格前后变化太大，有点生硬，莱托的气质还是蛮符合的，彩蛋比正片精彩，片尾字幕画面的迷幻居然是我喜欢的点，好家伙
平庸到极致也是一种烂。部分动作戏的设计也有精彩之处，但还是被烂俗且无逻辑的剧情掩盖。
又是像毒液2一样浪费时间的片子 索尼这样搞下去迟早要完蛋
各路差评之下降低期待值后看完觉得还行，剧情平庸特效来凑，倒也不太难看。
开头看到对家的蝙蝠乱飞就很想打一星了，中间看两个男主这么努力好像可以加到2.5星，而结局？？？直接半星不能更多。甚至于彩蛋看到基顿老爷要扣到负分的程度。
我还是忍不住看了。莱托大少爷好好选剧本啊。
不太明白索尼为什么又把毒液给拍了一遍。尽管多少还是比《毒液2》强点… #补标#
虽然是个无聊的吸血鬼人设，可俩男主真是太灵了。
我是个容易共情的观众，因为一个细节被打动就不再挑肥拣瘦。但是月骑让我发现他们不缺聪明的编剧，莫比亚斯就像是走了个过场，试试水，看能不能完成后面的蜘蛛毒液联动来捞金，这样浪费演员的电影，其心可诛！
典型的决定了结局然后瞎写故事 当下阶段的漫威电影真的不能考虑逻辑 因为主题公园有什么逻辑？
剧情太无聊了。。。大阵仗的铺垫，内核就是小打小闹。
各路差评之下降低期待值后看完觉得还行，剧情平庸特效来凑，倒也不太难看。
演员很努力的救场，可遭不住故事太没原创性，老八套的（反）超级英雄起源和俗套的反派戏码，关键是处理的很纠结，剧本不知道改了几遍，镜头也不知道重拍了多少次了，想B级也没B成，装恐怖片也是半吊子，苦大仇深的，你哪怕拍的娱乐性高点给我赶上毒液呢！彩蛋野心很大，不过目前看来索尼这套宇宙想硬蹭蜘蛛侠，难度实在是有点大。
《毒液》大賣之後的偷懶之作，一樣正反派同源，一樣沒種拍R級，一樣惡意賣腐，區別只是前者爛而賣座，《莫比亞斯》爛而不賣座。故事幼稚出了喜劇效果，該著筆的部分都沒著筆，該解釋的部分不解釋，擺爛得那麼理直氣壯也是一種本事，理直氣壯地kidding me。最可氣的是，本該是看點的動作戲和驚悚戲，都稀碎，動作戲無聊透頂，甚至談不上有什麼動作設計，就是沒完沒了的殘影、重擊、慢鏡頭，驚悚戲少得可憐，而且還都是是最爛俗老套的橋段。
额，这，感觉硬把一个起码150分钟的电影剪成了90分钟……制作组都无语了吧，真就是那种为了承接上小蜘蛛的剧情，硬弄成这样，可怜了我莱兔😅……另外这剧情真是没给编剧几分钱的错觉，要不然就是摆了……但我看之前就当成烂cult片品一品罢了，无脑看其实还挺爽的……一心向善，为了拯救生命的病态高智商医生，变成高机动吸血鬼，和兄弟反目成仇，把女朋友也变成吸血鬼……
典型的决定了结局然后瞎写故事 当下阶段的漫威电影真的不能考虑逻辑 因为主题公园有什么逻辑？
就那么点内容凑够了一部电影，真是醉了，我看得好困啊。
其实，大科学家可以研究一下，人血有什么成分能够让吸血鬼钟爱，然后造出有效的缓释胶囊，达到长久清醒的状态。另外，看完之后，感觉本片的剧情顶多能做一个三分钟…其实没啥剧情……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
